​

Pre-prints

• Yeh, L.-C., Gayet, S., Kaiser, D., & Peelen, M. V. The neural time course of size constancy in natural scenes.

• Zhang, L., Hendrikx, E., Wang, Y., Gayet, S., Dumoulin, S. O., & Harvey, B. M. Numerosity adaptation suppresses early visual responses.

• Arora, K., Gayet, S., Kenemans, J. L., Van der Stigchel, S., & Chota, S. Dissociating External and Internal Attentional Selection.

• Chota, S., Arora, K., Kenemans, J. L., Gayet, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. Gaze biases can reflect task-specific spatial memorization strategies.

• Stockart, F., Schreiber, M., et al. Studying unconscious processing: towards a consensus on best practices. 

• Yuan, Y., van der Stoep, N., & Gayet, S. Using hearing and vision for motion prediction, motion perception, and localization.

• Harvey, B. M., van Ackooij, M., van Helden, J., Hendrikx, E., Van der Stoep, N., Gayet, S., & Paul, J. M. Tuned responses to visual short-term memory load in a fronto-parietal topographic map hierarchy. 

• Xu, L., Gayet, S., Sahakian, A., Gottlieb, J. P., Van der Stigchel, S., & Paffen, C. L. E. Trade-offs between visual sampling and memory in stable and changing worlds.

• Sahakian, A., Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., Van der Stigchel, S. The rise and fall of memories: temporal dynamics of visual working memory.

• Arora, K., Gayet, S., Kenemans, J. L., Van der Stigchel, S., & Chota, S. Rapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT) in a novel setup with EEG. 

​​​

​2024 / in press

• Xu, L., Sahakian, A., Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (in press). Latent memory traces for prospective items in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception & Performance. 

• Xu, L., Paffen, C. L. E., Van der Stigchel, S., & Gayet, S. (2024). Statistical learning facilitates access to awareness. Psychological Science, 35(9), 1035-1047.

• Derksen, M., et al. (in press). Replication studies in the Netherlands: Lessons learned and recommendations for funders, publishers and editors, and universities. Accountability in Research: Ethics, Integrity and Policy.

• Sahakian, A., Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (in press). Action consequences guide the use of visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.

• Zerr, P., Gayet, S., Van der Stigchel, S. (2024). Memory reports are biased by all relevant contents of working memory. Scientific Reports, 14: 2507. 

• Gayet, S., Battistoni, E., Thorat, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2024). Searching near and far: the attentional template incorporates viewing distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50(20), 216-231.

• Litwin, P., Motyka, P., & Gayet, S. (2024). Physiological arousal underlies preferential access to visual awareness of fear-conditioned (and possibly disgust-conditioned) stimuli. Emotion, 24(3), 718-732.

​

​2023

• Aldegheri, G., Gayet, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2023). Scene context automatically drives predictions of object transformations. Cognition, 238: 105521.

• Chota, S., Gayet, S., Kenemans, J. L., Olivers, C. N. L., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2023). A matter of availability: Sharper tuning for memorized than for perceived stimulus features. Cerebral Cortex, 33(12), 7608-7618.

• Sahakian, A., Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2023). Mountains of memory in a sea of uncertainty: Sampling the external world despite useful information in visual working memory. Cognition, 234:105381.

​

2022

• Gayet, S., Sahakian, A., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2022). No evidence for social factors in the overestimation of individuals from minority groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(47): e2214740119.

• Sahakian, A., Paffen, C. L. E., Van der Stigchel, S., & Gayet, S. (2022). A nasal visual field advantage in interocular competition. Scientific Reports, 12:4616.

• Gayet, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2022). Preparatory attention incorporates contextual expectations. Current Biology, 32(3), 687-692.

​

2021

• Healthy Brain Consortium (2021). Protocol of the Healthy Brain Study: An accessible resource for understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context. PLoS ONE, 16(12): e0260952.

• Iamshchinina, P., Christophel, T. B., Gayet, S., & Rademaker, R. L. (2021). Essential considerations for exploring visual working memory storage in the human brain. Visual Cognition, 29(7), 425-436.

• Zerr, P., Gayet, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2021). The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 49, 1036-1049.

• Ding, Y., Naber, M., Paffen, C. L. E., Gayet, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2021). How retaining objects containing multiple features in visual working memory regulates the priority for access to visual awareness. Consciousness & Cognition, 87: 103057.

​

2020

• Gayet, S., Guggenmos, M., Christophel, T. B., Haynes, J.-D., Paffen, C. L. E., Sterzer, P., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2020). No evidence for mnemonic modulation of interocularly suppressed visual input. Neuroimage, 215, 116801. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116801

• Gayet, S., Douw, I., van der Burg, V., Van der Stigchel, S., & Paffen, C. L. E. (2020).  Hide and seek: Directing top-down attention is not sufficient for accelerating conscious access. Cortex, 122, 235-252.

​

2019

• Gayet, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2019). Scenes modulate object processing before interacting with memory templates. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1497-1509. 

• Dogge, M., Custers, R., Gayet, S., Hoijtink, H., & Aarts, H. (2019). Perception of action-outcomes is shaped by life-long and contextual expectations. Scientific Reports, 9:5225. 

• Gayet, S., Van Moorselaar, D., Paffen, C. L. E., Olivers, C. N. L., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2019). Prospectively reinstated memory drives conscious access of matching visual input. Scientific Reports, 9, 4793. 

• Moors, P., Gayet, S., Hedger, N., Stein, T., Sterzer, P., van Ee, R., Wagemans, J., & Hesselmann, G. (2019). Three criteria for evaluating high-level processing in continuous flash suppression. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), 267-269.

• Gayet, S., Stein, T., Peelen, M. V. (2019). The danger of interpreting detection differences between image categories, Emotion, 19(5), 928-932.

• Stein, T., Awad, D., Gayet, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2018). Unconscious processing of facial dominance: The role of low-level factors in access to awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), e1-e13.

​

2018

• Ding, Y., Naber, M., Gayet, S., Van der Stigchel, S., & Paffen, C. L. E. (2018). Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry and continuous flash suppression. Journal of Vision, 18(6): 6.

• Dogge, M., Gayet, S., Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2018). The influence of action-effect anticipation on bistable perception: differences between onset rivalry and ambiguous motion. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, niy004. 

• Paffen, C. L. E., Gayet, S., Heilbron, M., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2018).  Attention-based perceptual learning does not affect access to awareness. Journal of Vision, 18(3): 7.

• Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2018). Visual working memory storage recruits sensory processing areas. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 189-190.

• van Moorselaar, D., Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., Theeuwes, J., Van der Stigchel, S., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2018). Competitive interactions in visual working memory drive access to awareness. Cortex, 102, 6-13.

​

2017

• Zerr, P., Gayet, S., Mulder, K., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2017). Remapping high-capacity, pre-attentive, fragile sensory memory. Scientific Reports, 7:15940.

• Gayet, S., Guggenmos, M., Christophel, T. B., Haynes, J.-D., Paffen, C. L. E., Van der Stigchel, S., & Sterzer, P. (2017). Visual working memory enhances the neural response to matching visual input. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(28), 6638-6647.

• Gayet, S., & Stein, T. (2017). Between-subject variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression paradigm: Potential causes, consequences, and solutions. Frontiers in Psychology: Consciousness Research, 8, 437.

​

2016

• Gayet, S., van Maanen, L., Heilbron, M., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2016). Visual input that matches the content of visual working memory requires less (not faster) evidence sampling to reach conscious access. Journal of Vision, 16(11): 26.

• Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2016). Visual input signaling threat gains preferential access to awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm. Cognition, 149, 77-83.

​

2015

• Gayet, S., Brascamp, J. W., Van der Stigchel, S., & Paffen, C. L. E. (2015). Cogito ergo video: Task relevant information is involuntarily boosted into awareness. Journal of Vision, 15(5):3.

​

2014

• Gayet, S., Van der Stigchel, S., & Paffen, C. L. E. (2014). Breaking continuous flash suppression: Competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield. Frontiers in Psychology: Consciousness Research, 5, 460.

• Gayet, S., Van der Stigchel, S., & Paffen, C. L. E. (2014). Seeing is believing: Utilization of subliminal symbols requires a visible relevant context. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 489–507.

​

2013

• Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2013). Information matching the content of visual working memory is prioritized for conscious access. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2472–2480.